The ECoC evidence base
Forty years of European Capitals of Culture in their own words: what cities promised, what they did, and what the evaluations found.
documents
cities
evaluations
bid books
title years covered
19 documents of type ex-post evaluation for “Funding”
Clear
…2025 gGmbH: Contributing to the evaluation process City of Chemnitz/Department of Culture: Working documentation 46 47 6 OVERVIEW CULTURAL FUNDING 2019–2023 This chapter deals with selected data on the City of Chemnitz’s cultural funding…

Reports available at www.impacts08.net Impacts 08 gratefully acknowledges the funding and commitment from Liverpool City Council in commissioning this research programme, and the engagement of many individuals from within the Council in…

No direct funding was provided to Sigulda from the Rīga2014 programme meaning it was the ‘badge and brand’ of ECoC that the city used to stimulate funding from their own City Council as well as visitors to the city more generally.

Likewise, the Prime Minister and the Minister for Culture have been actively involved. 2.4.2 Funding The budget for Aarhus 2017, as proposed in the application, was 500m DKK (€66.7m). This was proposed to be expended as follows.

4.4.2 Funding A budget of €98m was proposed at both the pre-selection and final selection phases.62 This made Marseille-Provence one of the best-funded ECoC to date and ensured that a critical mass of activity could be implemented across…

The funding data shows that the budget planned for the cultural programme during the application phase was delivered in practice. The establishment of funding protocols with the main funders and having all funding sources identified during…