Encore
Ask the evidenceThe ArchiveAbout Encore
Sign in
Encore by Whitelabel, with Culture NextCities in the network: sign in for your workspace

The ECoC evidence base

The Archive

Forty years of European Capitals of Culture in their own words: what cities promised, what they did, and what the evaluations found.

documents
411

documents

cities
178

cities

evaluations
50

evaluations

bid books
180

bid books

1985–2030

title years covered

All shelvesEvaluations 50Monitoring and progress reports 1Bid books 180Panel reports 86Strategies and action plans 5Research, guides and frameworks 35Sent in by members 54Published by cities 11
TypeBid book (pre-selection) 15Bid book (final selection) 15Monitoring panel report 3Ex-post evaluation 19Strategy 2Research 3Other 1 Any type

19 documents of type ex-post evaluation for “Funding”

Clear
Ask Encore: “Funding”An answer from across the Archive, every claim cited to its document.

Found inside the documents

What the document types mean
Bid book (pre-selection)
A city's first application for the title, judged by the selection panel to make the shortlist.
Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Bid book (final selection)
A shortlisted city's full, final application for the title, with its programme, budget and plans.
Evidence of intent: what a city promised, not what it delivered.
Selection panel report
The EU expert panel's assessment of the bids in one competition, with its reasons and its recommendation.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Monitoring panel report
The EU expert panel's report on a designated city's preparations before its title year, with its advice.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Ex-post evaluation
An assessment, written after the title year or a programme, of what it actually achieved, usually by independent evaluators.
Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Monitoring or progress report
A city's own report on how its programme is going, written while it runs, with the figures it has tracked.
Evidence of outcome: what actually happened.
Strategy
A city's long-term plan or policy for culture, including legacy strategies and council decisions.
A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Action plan
A concrete plan of what a city or organisation will do, by when and with what resources.
A plan: how a city meant to deliver and keep going.
Guide or toolkit
Practical how-to material that others can reuse: guides, toolkits, handbooks and templates.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Research
Studies, frameworks and papers across one or more cities, written by researchers rather than by a city.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Other
Anything else: news, memos, programme brochures and documents that fit no type above.
Context: useful background, not a city's own evidence of what happened.
Chemnitz 2025
Chemnitz · 2025

…2025 gGmbH: Contributing to the evaluation process City of Chemnitz/Department of Culture: Working documentation 46 47 6 OVERVIEW CULTURAL FUNDING 2019–2023 This chapter deals with selected data on the City of Chemnitz’s cultural funding…

  • f59881a3-596e-4ec5-9027-5b7cc8b20dd8-garciaetal-2010-creating_an_impact-impacts08.pdf
    London. Contributed by London and published to everyone.

    Reports available at www.impacts08.net Impacts 08 gratefully acknowledges the funding and commitment from Liverpool City Council in commissioning this research programme, and the engagement of many individuals from within the Council in…

  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Umeå, Riga
    Umeå & Riga · 2014

    No direct funding was provided to Sigulda from the Rīga2014 programme meaning it was the ‘badge and brand’ of ECoC that the city used to stimulate funding from their own City Council as well as visitors to the city more generally.

  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Aarhus, Pafos
    Aarhus & Pafos · 2017

    Likewise, the Prime Minister and the Minister for Culture have been actively involved. 2.4.2 Funding The budget for Aarhus 2017, as proposed in the application, was 500m DKK (€66.7m). This was proposed to be expended as follows.

  • Marseille 2013
    Marseille-Provence · 2013

    4.4.2 Funding A budget of €98m was proposed at both the pre-selection and final selection phases.62 This made Marseille-Provence one of the best-funded ECoC to date and ensured that a critical mass of activity could be implemented across…

  • EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Guimarães, Maribor
    Guimarães & Maribor · 2012

    The funding data shows that the budget planned for the cultural programme during the application phase was delivered in practice. The establishment of funding protocols with the main funders and having all funding sources identified during…

  • Also matching the title, city or themes

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — ALL ex-post evaluations -summary

    Cross-city (EU summary 2007-2019) · 2019

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — 2019 (Matera & Plovdiv)

    Matera & Plovdiv · 2019

    Aarhus 2017

    Aarhus · 2017

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — 2016 (San Sebastián & Wrocław)

    San Sebastián & Wrocław · 2016

    San Sebastián 2016 — Evaluation Report

    San Sebastián · 2016

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — 2015 (Mons & Plzeň)

    Mons & Plzeň · 2015

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Tallinn, Turku

    Tallinn & Turku · 2011

    Turku 2011 — Final Report

    Turku · 2011

    EC Ex-Post Evaluation — Essen Ruhr, Pécs, Istanbul

    Essen/Ruhr, Pécs, Istanbul · 2010

    Liverpool 2008 — Impact Assessment

    Liverpool · 2008

    Luxembourg City 2007 — Evaluation Report

    Luxembourg & Greater Region · 2007

    Dublin 1991

    Dublin · 1991

    Glasgow 1990 — Monitoring Report

    Glasgow · 1990